Skip to Content

UNC system wants to split $200 tuition increase with state

1 comments
November 13, 2009
Tarini Parti
Assistant State & National Editor

The UNC-system Board of Governors proposed a plan Thursday to balance the universities’ and state’s needs for additional money while keeping tuition costs down for students.

UNC-system President Erskine Bowles also said he does not want campuses to raise in-state tuition by more than the $200 mandated by the legislature. UNC-Chapel Hill’s tuition and fee advisory task force recommended a larger increase Wednesday.

“In no case can in-state tuition go higher than $200,” Bowles said. “I’m a low-tuition guy. I don’t think students need to be the primary source of funding.”

Bowles’ plan would allow universities to draw money back from the tuition hike already instituted by the state legislature instead of further increasing tuition.

The N.C. General Assembly mandated in the budget passed this summer a tuition increase by the lesser of $200 or 8 percent for all students.

The revenue from that tuition increase goes to the state’s general fund, rather than going directly to the system.

“Students are paying more and we are not getting quality improvements,” said John Davis III, chairman of the board’s budget and finance committee.

Bowles said he will lobby legislators to allow universities to keep at least 50 percent of the revenue generated by money now lost to the state.

Those funds would help make up for the $12 million less in need-based financial aid the UNC system received this year.

Bowles said he wants the other half of the funds to go toward improving retention and graduation rates.

Contact the State & National Editor at stntdesk@unc.edu.

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"“In no case can in-state

Submitted by godbacchus on November 14, 2009 - 15:05.

"“In no case can in-state tuition go higher than $200,” Bowles said. “I’m a low-tuition guy. I don’t think students need to be the primary source of funding.”"

Wait. So we already have a system where the students that actually pay tuition *have* to pay for the other students that don't (recall earlier article indicating 50% of tuition goes to pay for need-based scholarships) actually pay tuition (in full or in part). And now, you're saying that students shouldn't be paying for school, at least, not be the PRIMARY source of funding?

Wow. *scratches head* Wow.

OK, not to be a complete *ss but yeah, sure, money grows on trees and taxpayers have unlimited funds.

Here's a suggestion, actually charge *all* students what tuition costs and use any taxpayer funds to guarantee loans for the student who qualified for those loans. I continue to hear how this (education) is an investment (in the person, in the state, etc.)... Why don't we treat it like one.

Let students borrow money to actually pay for their *own* education and they can begin repaying it once they leave the institution.

Now, poor people can still go to school (all of them, even those who didn't get the free ride), no one is excluded, we are the world and kumbaya.

We, as a nation, are about 12 TRILLION in debt, and we as students, expect even more handouts? What are we teaching at UNC?